South Sudan - Subnational Administrative Boundaries

Sudan administrative level 0-2 boundaries (COD-AB) dataset version 03. This dataset is structured into 2 levels: - Admin 1: 19 State - Admin 2: 189 Locality Dates associated with this dataset: - 30 October 2025: dataset reviewed for accuracy and completeness - 31 August 2020: valid for use by the humanitarian community - 13 August 2013: last edit to the dataset before publishing - 13 August 2013: boundaries created by the source Contributed by OCHA Regional Office for Southern and Eastern Africa (ROSEA). Quality assured, configured, and published by OCHA Field Information Services (FIS) and HDX. Part of the dataset: Global Subnational Administrative Boundaries

Metadata from source: https://data.humdata.org/dataset/cod-ab-ssd South Sudan administrative level 0-3 boundaries (COD-AB) dataset. These administrative boundaries were established in: 2020 NOTE: Ages disaggregated into only four cohorts. No COD-PS record for Abyei Region. See COD-PS caveat about data rounding. The geoservice layer and the pak_admbndl_admALL_ocha_itos_20230308 lines shapefile contains the following special 'admLevel' codes: 76 = Northern boundary of the disputed area known as the Ilemi Triangle between South Sudan and Kenya (not a boundary fo any administrative polygon) 77 = Remainder of the boundary between South Sudan and Sudan 78 = That part of the Abyei region bouhndary that borders Sudan 79 = That part of the Abyei region boundary that borders the rest of South Sudan (not included in the polygons layers) This COD-AB was most recently reviewed for accuracy and necessary changes in October 2024. The COD-AB requires improvements. Sourced from South Sudan Information Management Working Group (IMWG), National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), International Organization for Migration (IOM) and OCHA Vetting by Information Technology Outreach Services (ITOS) with funding from USAID. This COD-AB is suitable for database or GIS linkage to the South Sudan COD-PS. No edge-matched (COD-EM) version of this COD-AB has yet been prepared. Please see the COD Portal. Administrative level 1 contains 10 feature(s). The normal administrative level 1 feature type is ""State"". Administrative level 2 contains 79 feature(s). The normal administrative level 2 feature type is ""County"". Administrative level 3 contains 512 feature(s). The normal administrative level 3 feature type is ""Payam"". Recommended cartographic projection: UTM zone 36 (mainly) but partly zone 35 This metadata was last updated on January 9, 2025.

Metadata from source: https://data.humdata.org/dataset/cod-ab-ssd South Sudan administrative level 0-3 boundaries (COD-AB) dataset. These administrative boundaries were established in: 2020 NOTE: Ages disaggregated into only four cohorts. No COD-PS record for Abyei Region. See COD-PS caveat about data rounding. The geoservice layer and the pak_admbndl_admALL_ocha_itos_20230308 lines shapefile contains the following special 'admLevel' codes: 76 = Northern boundary of the disputed area known as the Ilemi Triangle between South Sudan and Kenya (not a boundary fo any administrative polygon) 77 = Remainder of the boundary between South Sudan and Sudan 78 = That part of the Abyei region bouhndary that borders Sudan 79 = That part of the Abyei region boundary that borders the rest of South Sudan (not included in the polygons layers) This COD-AB was most recently reviewed for accuracy and necessary changes in October 2024. The COD-AB requires improvements. Sourced from South Sudan Information Management Working Group (IMWG), National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), International Organization for Migration (IOM) and OCHA Vetting by Information Technology Outreach Services (ITOS) with funding from USAID. This COD-AB is suitable for database or GIS linkage to the South Sudan COD-PS. No edge-matched (COD-EM) version of this COD-AB has yet been prepared. Please see the COD Portal. Administrative level 1 contains 10 feature(s). The normal administrative level 1 feature type is ""State"". Administrative level 2 contains 79 feature(s). The normal administrative level 2 feature type is ""County"". Administrative level 3 contains 512 feature(s). The normal administrative level 3 feature type is ""Payam"". Recommended cartographic projection: UTM zone 36 (mainly) but partly zone 35 This metadata was last updated on January 9, 2025.

South Africa administrative level 0-4 boundaries (COD-AB) dataset version 01. This dataset is structured into 4 levels: - Admin 1: 9 Province - Admin 2: 52 District - Admin 3: 213 Local municipality - Admin 4: 4392 Dates associated with this dataset: - 28 January 2025: dataset reviewed for accuracy and completeness - 09 November 2020: valid for use by the humanitarian community - 27 December 2018: last edit to the dataset before publishing - 27 December 2018: boundaries created by the source Contributed by OCHA Regional Office for Southern and Eastern Africa (ROSEA). Quality assured, configured, and published by OCHA Field Information Services (FIS) and HDX. Part of the dataset: Global Subnational Administrative Boundaries

Gambia administrative level 0-3 boundaries (COD-AB) dataset version 01. This dataset is structured into 3 levels: - Admin 1: 8 - Admin 2: 49 - Admin 3: 115 Dates associated with this dataset: - 30 October 2025: dataset reviewed for accuracy and completeness - 01 September 2022: valid for use by the humanitarian community - 17 August 2022: last edit to the dataset before publishing - 17 August 2022: boundaries created by the source Quality assured, configured, and published by OCHA Field Information Services (FIS) and HDX. Part of the dataset: Global Subnational Administrative Boundaries

Nepal administrative level 0-3 boundaries (COD-AB) dataset version 02. This dataset is structured into 3 levels: - Admin 1: 7 - Admin 2: 77 - Admin 3: 775 Dates associated with this dataset: - 30 October 2025: dataset reviewed for accuracy and completeness - 14 March 2024: valid for use by the humanitarian community - 01 January 2024: last edit to the dataset before publishing - 01 January 2024: boundaries created by the source Quality assured, configured, and published by OCHA Field Information Services (FIS) and HDX. Part of the dataset: Global Subnational Administrative Boundaries