1.12 Violent Cases Clearance Rate (summary)

✦ DISCOVERED BY ORIONAIVECTORTempeDataSocietyUnited States of America
Map preview of 1.12 Violent Cases Clearance Rate (summary)United States of America

About this dataset

This dataset provides the percentage of cases cleared in a 4-year period out of the total number of offenses reported for the City of Tempe and cohort cities. Clearance rates are developed as part of the Department’s report for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) under the Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Program. NIBRS reporting includes Group A and Group B offenses. Group A offenses are categorized as Crimes Against Persons, Crime Against Property, or Crimes Against Society and are used for this dataset. The statistics in the UCR Program are based on reports the Tempe Police Department officially submits to the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS).  In the UCR Program, there are two ways that a law enforcement agency can report that an offense is cleared:  (1) cleared by arrest or solved for crime reporting purposes or  (2) cleared by exceptional means.   An offense is cleared by arrest, or solved for crime reporting purposes, when three specific conditions have been met. The three conditions are that at least one person has been: (1) arrested; (2) charged with the commission of the offense; and (3) turned over to the court for prosecution.   In some situations, an agency may be prevented from arresting and formally charging an offender due to factors outside of the agency’s control. In these cases, an offense can be cleared by exceptional means, if the following four conditions are met: (1) identified the offender; (2) gathered enough evidence to support an arrest, make a charge, and turn over the offender to the court for prosecution; (3) identified offender’s exact location so that suspect can immediately be taken into custody; and (4) encountered a circumstance outside law enforcement’s control that prohibits arresting, charging and prosecuting the offender.  The UCR clearance rate is one tool for helping the police to understand and assess success at investigating crimes. However, these rates should be interpreted with an understanding of the unique challenges faced with reporting and investigating crimes. Clearance rates for a given year may be greater than 100% because a clearance is reported for the year the clearance occurs, which may not be the same year that the crime occurred. Often, investigations may take months or years, resulting in cases being cleared years after the actual offense. Additionally, there may be delays in the reporting of crimes, which would push the clearance of the case out beyond the year it happened.  The performance measure dashboard is available at 1.12 Violent Cases Clearance Rate   Data Dictionary - (pending)   Additional Information  Source: Tempe Police Department (TPD) Versadex Records Management System (RMS) submitted to Arizona Department of Public Safety (AZ DPS) who submits data to the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) Contact:  Miranda O'Boyle Contact E-Mail: miranda_oboyle@tempe.gov Data Source Type:  Excel Preparation Method:  Drawn from the Monthly AZ DPS reports/online publications Publish Frequency:  Annually Publish Method: Manual

Columns (9)

TypestringAverage_TypestringLocationstringCrime_typestringstatusstringmetricValuenumberasOfDatenumbercommentstringObjectIdnumber

Sample rows

TypestatuscommentLocationObjectIdasOfDateCrime_typemetricValueAverage_Type
Reported DataTempe11735628400000Persons0.4487
Reported DataTempe21735628400000Property0.1411
Reported DataTempe31735628400000Society0.8323
TargetCohort Cities Average41767164400000Persons0.3302
TargetCohort Cities Average51767164400000Property0.1462
TargetCohort Cities Average61767164400000Society0.8463
Reported DataAchievedTempe71767164400000Persons0.464
Reported DataAchievedTempe81767164400000Property0.155

A sample of the data. The full table and an interactive map open with a free account.

Related datasets

✦ Suggested by OrionAI
1.06 Crime Reporting (summary)

This dataset comes from the Annual Community Survey questions that relate to this performance measure, if they answered "Yes" to being a victim of crime in the past 6 months: “Were the police informed that your household had been burglarized, or did they find out about this incident in any way?” and "Were the police informed that you were robbed, physically assaulted, or sexually assaulted, or did they find out about this incident in any way?" Respondents are asked to provide their answer as “Yes” or “No” (without “don’t know” as an option). The survey is mailed to a random sample of households in the City of Tempe and has a 95% confidence level. This page provides data for the Victim Not Reporting Crime to Police performance measure.  The performance measure dashboard is available at 1.06 Crime Reporting   Data Dictionary   Additional Information   Source: Community Attitude Survey Contact:  Wydale Holmes Contact E-Mail: Wydale_Holmes@tempe.gov Data Source Type:  CSV Preparation Method:  Data received from vendor and entered into CSV Publish Frequency:  Annual Publish Method: Manual

Society · TempeData
1.09 Victim of Crime (summary)

This dataset comes from Annual Community Survey questions related to whether residents have been victims of a crime. Respondents are asked the following questions: a) "Have you been robbed, physically assaulted, or sexually assaulted in past 6 months?" or, b) "Has anyone in your household age 12 or older had a vehicle stolen, property or cash stolen, or has your household been burglarized in past 6 months?” Please note that the survey question has been restructured over time to better help determine priorities for the community. The survey is mailed to a random sample of households in the City of Tempe and has a 95% confidence level. This page provides data for the Victim of Crime performance measure.  The performance measure dashboard is available at 1.09 Victim of Crime   Data Dictionary   Additional Information   Source: Community Attitude Survey Contact:  Wydale Holmes Contact E-Mail: Wydale_Holmes@tempe.gov Data Source Type:  CSV Preparation Method:  Data received from vendor and entered into CSV Publish Frequency:  Annual Publish Method: Manual

Society · TempeData
4.11 Tree Coverage (summary)

This page provides data for the Tree and Shade Canopy performance measure. Sustainable growth for the City of Tempe is influenced by many factors, including the development and maintenance of our tree canopy. An adequate canopy provides shade, cooling, reduces water evaporation, and is an indication of a healthy and well-maintained environment. As per the Urban Forestry Master Plan, this data represents tree canopy in parks, street right-of-ways, and municipally owned and managed facilities. The performance measure dashboard is available at 4.11 Tree Coverage     Data Dictionary   Additional Information   Source:  Contact:  Craig Hayton Contact E-Mail: Craig_Hayton@tempe.gov Data Source Type:  CSV Preparation Method:  Tracked by staff quarterly Publish Frequency:  Annual Publish Method: Manual

Biodiversity · TempeData
Tempe Youth Fentanyl Awareness and Use - Arizona Youth Survey (Dataset)

The Arizona Youth Survey (AYS) is administered every two years to a statewide sample of 8th, 10th, and 12th grade youth under the direction of the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission Statistical Analysis Center. The survey includes questions assessing youth substance use, including fentanyl. This dataset contains selected fentanyl-related survey results for Tempe youth. Each record represents a survey question or response category for a specific grade level and survey year. Key fields include survey question, grade, year, percentage value, and grade. Unless otherwise noted in the Question field, percentage values represent respondents providing an affirmative response to the listed question or statement. Alternative response categories are identified in parentheses, such as (No). This data is sourced from the Arizona Youth Survey and has been prepared by the City of Tempe for use in the Tempe Youth Fentanyl Awareness and Use dashboard and for public data access. Data Scope The dataset includes selected fentanyl-related Arizona Youth Survey results for Tempe youth in 8th, 10th, and 12th grades for available survey years. Data are provided as aggregated percentages by survey question, grade level, and year and do not represent individual survey respondents. Data Use This dataset may be used to explore fentanyl awareness and reported use among surveyed Tempe youth and to compare results across grade levels and available survey years. It supports the Tempe Youth Fentanyl Awareness and Use dashboard. Data Limitations Results represent youth participating in the Arizona Youth Survey and should be interpreted within the methodology and limitations of the survey. Availability of questions and results may vary by survey year and grade level. A value of -8888 indicates that no data were provided for the question, grade, and year combination. This may indicate that the survey question was not asked or that a result was otherwise unavailable. -8888 should not be interpreted as 0%. For additional information about the Arizona Youth Survey and its methodology, see the Arizona Youth Survey. Data Dictionary Additional Information Contact Name: Mary Mezey Contact Email: Mary_Mezey@tempe.gov Data Source: Arizona Youth Survey (AYS), Arizona Criminal Justice Commission Statistical Analysis Center Data Source Type: Excel workbook Preparation Method: A subset of Arizona Youth Survey results specific to Tempe was provided to the City of Tempe in Excel format. The source data were transformed into a machine-readable tabular format in Power BI. Each record represents a survey question or response category by grade level and survey year. Missing or unavailable values are represented by -8888. Publish Method: Manual Publish Frequency: Biennial, based on availability of Arizona Youth Survey data.

Health · TempeData
Louisville Metro KY - Crime Data 2026

The data provided in this dataset is preliminary in nature and may have not been investigated by a detective at the time of download. The data is therefore subject to change after a complete investigation. This data represents only calls for police service where a police incident report was taken. Due to the variations in local laws and ordinances involving crimes across the nation, whether another agency utilizes Uniform Crime Report (UCR) or National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) guidelines, and the results learned after an official investigation, comparisons should not be made between the statistics generated with this dataset to any other official police reports. Totals in the database may vary considerably from official totals following the investigation and final categorization of a crime. Therefore, the data should not be used for comparisons with Uniform Crime Report or other summary statistics.   Data is broken out by year into separate CSV files. Note the file grouping by year is based on the crime's Date Reported (not the Date Occurred). Older cases found in the 2003 data are indicative of cold case research. Older cases are entered into the Police database system and tracked but dates and times of the original case are maintained. Data may also be viewed off-site in map form for just the last 6 months on communitycrimemap.com Data Dictionary: Field Name Field Description Incident Number the number associated with either the incident or used as reference to store the items in our evidence rooms Date Reported the date the incident was reported to LMPD Date Occurred the date the incident actually occurred Badge ID Badge ID of responding Officer Offense Classification NIBRS Reporting category for the criminal act committed Offense Code Name NIBRS Reporting code for the criminal act committed NIBRS_CODE the code that follows the guidelines of the National Incident Based Reporting System. For more details visit https://ucr.fbi.gov/nibrs/2011/resources/nibrs-offense-codes/view NIBRS Group hierarchy that follows the guidelines of the FBI National Incident Based Reporting System Was Offense Completed Status indicating whether the incident was an attempted crime or a completed crime. LMPD Division the LMPD division in which the incident actually occurred LMPD Beat the LMPD beat in which the incident actually occurred Location Category the type of location in which the incident occurred (e.g. Restaurant) Block Address the location the incident occurred City the city associated to the incident block location Zip Code the zip code associated to the incident block location Contact: LMPD Open Records    lmpdopenrecords@louisvilleky.gov

Society · LouisvilleMetro
1.31 Ending Opioid Overdoses

This dataset provides annual fatal and nonfatal overdose counts for Tempe. Each record represents one calendar year and includes the number of fatal overdoses and nonfatal overdoses reported for that year. Key fields include year, fatal overdose count, and nonfatal overdose count. This data is sourced from the Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology. This information is a component of ongoing efforts to monitor overdose trends, inform prevention and response strategies, guide resource planning, and support improved public health in the City of Tempe. This page provides details about the Ending Opioids Overdoses performance measure.    The performance measure dashboard is available at 1.31 Ending Opioid Overdoses   Data Dictionary   Additional Information   Source: Tempe Overdose Report, Maricopa County Department of Public Health Division of Epidemiology Contact: Mary Mezey Contact E-Mail: Mary_Mezey@tempe.gov Contact Phone: 480-350-5428 Data Source Type:  Excel  Preparation Method:  Data is provided in a report Publish Frequency:  Annual Publish Method: Manual

Health · TempeData

Indexed by OrionGIS from ArcGIS Online public items (authoritative). Data is loaded from the publisher's own server when you use it. Permanent link