Tempe Overdoses – Maricopa County Department of Public Health (Dataset)
About this dataset
Columns (8)
Sample rows
| Year | Count_ | Category | ObjectId | Geography | Subcategory | Overdose_Type | Percent_Decimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 72 | Overall | 1 | Tempe | Number of fatal overdoses | Fatal | -8888 |
| 2020 | 89 | Overall | 2 | Tempe | Number of fatal overdoses | Fatal | -8888 |
| 2021 | 105 | Overall | 3 | Tempe | Number of fatal overdoses | Fatal | -8888 |
| 2022 | 97 | Overall | 4 | Tempe | Number of fatal overdoses | Fatal | -8888 |
| 2023 | 90 | Overall | 5 | Tempe | Number of fatal overdoses | Fatal | -8888 |
| 2024 | 89 | Overall | 6 | Tempe | Number of fatal overdoses | Fatal | -8888 |
| 2025 | 108 | Overall | 7 | Tempe | Number of fatal overdoses | Fatal | -8888 |
| 2019 | -8888 | Overall | 8 | Tempe | Proportion of county | Fatal | 0.049 |
A sample of the data. The full table and an interactive map open with a free account.
Related datasets
✦ Suggested by OrionAIThis dataset provides annual fatal and nonfatal overdose counts for Tempe. Each record represents one calendar year and includes the number of fatal overdoses and nonfatal overdoses reported for that year. Key fields include year, fatal overdose count, and nonfatal overdose count. This data is sourced from the Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology. This information is a component of ongoing efforts to monitor overdose trends, inform prevention and response strategies, guide resource planning, and support improved public health in the City of Tempe. This page provides details about the Ending Opioids Overdoses performance measure. The performance measure dashboard is available at 1.31 Ending Opioid Overdoses Data Dictionary Additional Information Source: Tempe Overdose Report, Maricopa County Department of Public Health Division of Epidemiology Contact: Mary Mezey Contact E-Mail: Mary_Mezey@tempe.gov Contact Phone: 480-350-5428 Data Source Type: Excel Preparation Method: Data is provided in a report Publish Frequency: Annual Publish Method: Manual
The Arizona Youth Survey (AYS) is administered every two years to a statewide sample of 8th, 10th, and 12th grade youth under the direction of the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission Statistical Analysis Center. The survey includes questions assessing youth substance use, including fentanyl. This dataset contains selected fentanyl-related survey results for Tempe youth. Each record represents a survey question or response category for a specific grade level and survey year. Key fields include survey question, grade, year, percentage value, and grade. Unless otherwise noted in the Question field, percentage values represent respondents providing an affirmative response to the listed question or statement. Alternative response categories are identified in parentheses, such as (No). This data is sourced from the Arizona Youth Survey and has been prepared by the City of Tempe for use in the Tempe Youth Fentanyl Awareness and Use dashboard and for public data access. Data Scope The dataset includes selected fentanyl-related Arizona Youth Survey results for Tempe youth in 8th, 10th, and 12th grades for available survey years. Data are provided as aggregated percentages by survey question, grade level, and year and do not represent individual survey respondents. Data Use This dataset may be used to explore fentanyl awareness and reported use among surveyed Tempe youth and to compare results across grade levels and available survey years. It supports the Tempe Youth Fentanyl Awareness and Use dashboard. Data Limitations Results represent youth participating in the Arizona Youth Survey and should be interpreted within the methodology and limitations of the survey. Availability of questions and results may vary by survey year and grade level. A value of -8888 indicates that no data were provided for the question, grade, and year combination. This may indicate that the survey question was not asked or that a result was otherwise unavailable. -8888 should not be interpreted as 0%. For additional information about the Arizona Youth Survey and its methodology, see the Arizona Youth Survey. Data Dictionary Additional Information Contact Name: Mary Mezey Contact Email: Mary_Mezey@tempe.gov Data Source: Arizona Youth Survey (AYS), Arizona Criminal Justice Commission Statistical Analysis Center Data Source Type: Excel workbook Preparation Method: A subset of Arizona Youth Survey results specific to Tempe was provided to the City of Tempe in Excel format. The source data were transformed into a machine-readable tabular format in Power BI. Each record represents a survey question or response category by grade level and survey year. Missing or unavailable values are represented by -8888. Publish Method: Manual Publish Frequency: Biennial, based on availability of Arizona Youth Survey data.
This feature layer provides counts of registered medium & heavy duty (class 2b to 8) electric vehicles in Tempe by zip code. Each record represents a zip code and includes details about counts of registered vehicles each zip code. This data is sourced from national vehicle registration data. This information is a component of ongoing efforts to provide resources for EV charging infrastructure development in the City of Tempe. Data Scope Vehicle registration data was summarized for Q4 2025. Data Use For use in the Tempe EVCI Development Strategy Map Data Limitations Polygons depict interpretations of USPS zip code boundaries and were accessed from the City of Tempe's Data Catalog. Data does not depict class 1, light duty vehicle registration information. Data Dictionary Additional Information Contact Name: Sustainability Division Contact Email: sustainability@tempe.gov Data Source: IHS Markit, City of Tempe Data Source Type: GIS Feature Layer Preparation Method: Zip Code boundary data for Tempe was joined with vehicle registration by zip code. Publish Method: Manual Publish Frequency: One-time, static dataset
This dataset provides the percentage of cases cleared in a 4-year period out of the total number of offenses reported for the City of Tempe and cohort cities. Clearance rates are developed as part of the Department’s report for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) under the Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Program. NIBRS reporting includes Group A and Group B offenses. Group A offenses are categorized as Crimes Against Persons, Crime Against Property, or Crimes Against Society and are used for this dataset. The statistics in the UCR Program are based on reports the Tempe Police Department officially submits to the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS). In the UCR Program, there are two ways that a law enforcement agency can report that an offense is cleared: (1) cleared by arrest or solved for crime reporting purposes or (2) cleared by exceptional means. An offense is cleared by arrest, or solved for crime reporting purposes, when three specific conditions have been met. The three conditions are that at least one person has been: (1) arrested; (2) charged with the commission of the offense; and (3) turned over to the court for prosecution. In some situations, an agency may be prevented from arresting and formally charging an offender due to factors outside of the agency’s control. In these cases, an offense can be cleared by exceptional means, if the following four conditions are met: (1) identified the offender; (2) gathered enough evidence to support an arrest, make a charge, and turn over the offender to the court for prosecution; (3) identified offender’s exact location so that suspect can immediately be taken into custody; and (4) encountered a circumstance outside law enforcement’s control that prohibits arresting, charging and prosecuting the offender. The UCR clearance rate is one tool for helping the police to understand and assess success at investigating crimes. However, these rates should be interpreted with an understanding of the unique challenges faced with reporting and investigating crimes. Clearance rates for a given year may be greater than 100% because a clearance is reported for the year the clearance occurs, which may not be the same year that the crime occurred. Often, investigations may take months or years, resulting in cases being cleared years after the actual offense. Additionally, there may be delays in the reporting of crimes, which would push the clearance of the case out beyond the year it happened. The performance measure dashboard is available at 1.12 Violent Cases Clearance Rate Data Dictionary - (pending) Additional Information Source: Tempe Police Department (TPD) Versadex Records Management System (RMS) submitted to Arizona Department of Public Safety (AZ DPS) who submits data to the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) Contact: Miranda O'Boyle Contact E-Mail: miranda_oboyle@tempe.gov Data Source Type: Excel Preparation Method: Drawn from the Monthly AZ DPS reports/online publications Publish Frequency: Annually Publish Method: Manual
This dataset comes from Annual Community Survey questions related to whether residents have been victims of a crime. Respondents are asked the following questions: a) "Have you been robbed, physically assaulted, or sexually assaulted in past 6 months?" or, b) "Has anyone in your household age 12 or older had a vehicle stolen, property or cash stolen, or has your household been burglarized in past 6 months?” Please note that the survey question has been restructured over time to better help determine priorities for the community. The survey is mailed to a random sample of households in the City of Tempe and has a 95% confidence level. This page provides data for the Victim of Crime performance measure. The performance measure dashboard is available at 1.09 Victim of Crime Data Dictionary Additional Information Source: Community Attitude Survey Contact: Wydale Holmes Contact E-Mail: Wydale_Holmes@tempe.gov Data Source Type: CSV Preparation Method: Data received from vendor and entered into CSV Publish Frequency: Annual Publish Method: Manual
The data represents individuals arrested with a marijuana charge, regardless of whether there was a more serious secondary charge. If an arrestee was charged with multiple marijuana charges, the arrest is only counted once under the more serious charge type (Manufacture/Cultivation > Distribution > Possession with Intent to Distribute > Possession > Public Consumption). The category of “Manufacture or Cultivation” was added in the 2019 data and for future years, but is not utilized in prior years. MPD collects race and ethnicity data according to the United States Census Bureau standards (https://www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html). Hispanic, which was previously categorized under the Race field prior to August 2015, is now captured under Ethnicity. All records prior to August 2015 have been updated to “Unknown (Race), Hispanic (Ethnicity).” Data on race and ethnicity prior to November 9, 2018 was based on officer observation; on and after November 9, 2018, the data is based on the arrestee’s response. MPD cannot release exact addresses to the general public unless proof of ownership or subpoena is submitted. The GeoX and GeoY values represent the block location (approximately 232 ft. radius) as of the date of the arrest. Due to the Department’s redistricting efforts in 2012 and 2019, data may not be comparable in some years. Arrestee age is calculated based on the number of days between the self-reported or verified date of birth (DOB) of the arrestee and the date of the arrest; DOB data may not be accurate if self-reported or if the arrestee refused to provide it. Due to the sensitive nature of juvenile data and to protect the arrestee’s confidentiality, any arrest records for defendants under the age of 18 have been coded as “NA” for the following fields: • Arrest Hour • CCN • Age • Offense Location Block GeoX/Y • Defendant Race • Defendant Ethnicity • Defendant Sex • Arrest Location Block Address • Arrest Location Block GeoX/Y This data may not match other marijuana data requests that may have included all law enforcement agencies in the District, or only the most serious charge. Figures are subject to change due to record sealing, expungements, and data quality audits.
Indexed by OrionGIS from ArcGIS Online public items (authoritative). Data is loaded from the publisher's own server when you use it. Permanent link