United States of America GIS data

ACS 2015 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2015 vintage

Glacier polygons representing glacier areas. Each row is a polygon with attributes for name, area, and centroid coordinates. Published by the US Census Bureau for the United States.

Census Current (2026) WMS Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2026 vintage

Congressional Districts, Voting Districts, State Legislative Districts - Upper, State Legislative Districts - Lower; January 1, 2018 vintage; Generalized

Date of Images: 01/07/2025, 01/10/2025 Summary: Land surface temperature is the heat you would feel as you touch the ground, rooftop, or other surface. Certain materials retain more heat than others – for instance, beach sand is warmer than vegetated regions. Very recently burned areas will maintain some residual heat, and active fires will have very high heat signatures. Water holds onto heat for longer than land, so the ocean is warmer than the land at night and cooler than the land during the day. The ECOsystem Spaceborne Thermal Radiometer Experiment on Space Station (ECOSTRESS) mission measures the temperature of plants to better understand how much water plants need and how they respond to stress. ECOSTRESS is attached to the International Space Station (ISS) and collects data globally as well as key biomes and agricultural zones around the world and selected FLUXNET validation sites. A map of the acquisition coverage can be found on the ECOSTRESS website. The ECO2LSTE Version 2 data product provides atmospherically corrected land surface temperature and emissivity (LST&E) values derived from five thermal infrared (TIR) bands. The ECO2LSTE data product was derived using a physics-based Temperature and Emissivity Separation (TES) algorithm. Satellite/Sensor: ECOsystem Spaceborne Thermal Radiometer Experiment on Space Station (ECOSTRESS) on the International Space Station (ISS) Resolution: 70 meters Credits: NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, International Space Station (ISS) For More Information: ECOSTRESS Project at JPL: https://ecostress.jpl.nasa.gov/ Hook, S., Hulley, G. (2019). ECOSTRESS Land Surface Temperature and Emissivity Daily L2 Global 70 m V001 [Data set]. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center. Accessed 2023-08-15 from https://doi.org/10.5067/ECOSTRESS/ECO2LSTE.001 Service URL: https://gis.earthdata.nasa.gov/portal/home/item.html?id=04cde7850ceb45178e33fc049c9071ee WMS Endpoint: https://gis.earthdata.nasa.gov/portal/services/DISASTERS_202501_FIRE_CA/2501_ecostress/ImageServer/WMSServer

Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2010 vintage

CWHR Predicted Habitat Models represent areas of predicted suitable habitat for each species within its range. These models are built from the following principal inputs: 1) a statewide, best-available vegetation map (FVEG); 2) GIS data representing a species’ range; 3) the CWHR database of habitat suitability values for over 700 terrestrial vertebrate species. Habitat suitability ranks of Low (non-zero values less than 0.34), Medium (0.34-0.66), and High (greater than 0.66) are based on the maximum suitability value across the 3 species life requisites: reproduction, feeding, and cover. Note that previous versions of these Predicted Habitat Models used an average across the 3 life requisites in order to obtain an overall suitability score for each habitat type and stage class. Habitat suitability scores were developed based on habitat patch sizes greater than 40 acres in size and are best interpreted for habitat patches greater than 200 acres in size. The FVEG landcover dataset is an aggregation of multiple statewide landcover and regional vegetation mapping efforts, conducted at different points in time (approximately 1990 up to time of publishing) and at various resolutions, compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE). FVEG uses the most current and consistent data available for each region of the state. Decision rules were developed that controlled which layers were given priority in areas of overlap. Crosswalks were used to attribute the various data sources according to the CWHR habitat-type classification system. Attributing FVEG with CWHR habitat types allows for the extraction of areas with non-zero suitability values for each species within the bounds of its range, creating a series of maps of predicted suitable habitat which are species-specific. Because FVEG is an amalgam of disparate landcover assessment efforts across the state, the predictive power for determining suitable habitat will vary between species, and possibly even regionally for species which are widely distributed. While these maps represent CDFW’s best estimate of the presence of suitable habitat for any given species in the CWHR system, these maps are also limited by several factors: 1) the accuracy and resolution of vegetation maps in a given region; 2) the dynamic nature of the landscape in which fire and other disturbance events alter conditions at a greater frequency than mapping efforts can track; 3) the currency of expert knowledge, particularly as species adapt to changing land and climate conditions and the shifting of other species’ ranges; 4) the frequency of species-specific surveys across a representative sample of a species’ entire range; 5) metapopulation dynamics, which describes the shifting of populations within their environment as result of numerous types of interactions and responses. CWHR GIS data representing predicted suitable habitat should not be used to indicate the presence or absence of a particular species at any specific site. CWHR predicted habitat models are named according to the 4-character alpha-numeric CWHR ID assigned to each species (5 characters in the case of subspecies or other sub-taxa). There is also a “CWHR Revision Tracking Table” containing a record for each species, its CWHR ID, scientific name, common name, and range and habitat model data revision history. CWHR species range models, predicted habitat models, and GIS data of the statewide distribution of all CWHR habitat types, along with the CWHR revision tracking table, are available for download at https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CWHR.

CWHR Predicted Habitat Models represent areas of predicted suitable habitat for each species within its range. These models are built from the following principal inputs: 1) a statewide, best-available vegetation map (FVEG); 2) GIS data representing a species’ range; 3) the CWHR database of habitat suitability values for over 700 terrestrial vertebrate species. Habitat suitability ranks of Low (non-zero values less than 0.34), Medium (0.34-0.66), and High (greater than 0.66) are based on the maximum suitability value across the 3 species life requisites: reproduction, feeding, and cover. Note that previous versions of these Predicted Habitat Models used an average across the 3 life requisites in order to obtain an overall suitability score for each habitat type and stage class. Habitat suitability scores were developed based on habitat patch sizes greater than 40 acres in size and are best interpreted for habitat patches greater than 200 acres in size. The FVEG landcover dataset is an aggregation of multiple statewide landcover and regional vegetation mapping efforts, conducted at different points in time (approximately 1990 up to time of publishing) and at various resolutions, compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE). FVEG uses the most current and consistent data available for each region of the state. Decision rules were developed that controlled which layers were given priority in areas of overlap. Crosswalks were used to attribute the various data sources according to the CWHR habitat-type classification system. Attributing FVEG with CWHR habitat types allows for the extraction of areas with non-zero suitability values for each species within the bounds of its range, creating a series of maps of predicted suitable habitat which are species-specific. Because FVEG is an amalgam of disparate landcover assessment efforts across the state, the predictive power for determining suitable habitat will vary between species, and possibly even regionally for species which are widely distributed. While these maps represent CDFW’s best estimate of the presence of suitable habitat for any given species in the CWHR system, these maps are also limited by several factors: 1) the accuracy and resolution of vegetation maps in a given region; 2) the dynamic nature of the landscape in which fire and other disturbance events alter conditions at a greater frequency than mapping efforts can track; 3) the currency of expert knowledge, particularly as species adapt to changing land and climate conditions and the shifting of other species’ ranges; 4) the frequency of species-specific surveys across a representative sample of a species’ entire range; 5) metapopulation dynamics, which describes the shifting of populations within their environment as result of numerous types of interactions and responses. CWHR GIS data representing predicted suitable habitat should not be used to indicate the presence or absence of a particular species at any specific site. CWHR predicted habitat models are named according to the 4-character alpha-numeric CWHR ID assigned to each species (5 characters in the case of subspecies or other sub-taxa). There is also a “CWHR Revision Tracking Table” containing a record for each species, its CWHR ID, scientific name, common name, and range and habitat model data revision history. CWHR species range models, predicted habitat models, and GIS data of the statewide distribution of all CWHR habitat types, along with the CWHR revision tracking table, are available for download at https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CWHR.

ACS 2018 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2018 vintage

Congressional Districts, Voting Districts, State Legislative Districts - Upper, State Legislative Districts - Lower; January 1, 2022 vintage; Generalized

ACS 2025 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2025 vintage

Point locations of principal cities within Core Based Statistical Areas, published by the US Census Bureau. Each point represents one principal city and includes its name and state code. Coverage is the United States.

Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2000 vintage

ACS 2024 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2024 vintage

uav imagery by NYenvironcom, acquired 2026-02-22 to 2026-02-22, 3.7 cm per pixel, published on OpenAerialMap.

ACS 2021 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2021 vintage

Dates of Images: Post-Event: January 26, 2026; January 27, 2026; January 28, 2026; January 29, 2026 Pre-Event: December 2025 (composite) Please Note: Images with majority cloud cover are not shown in the Map Viewer, but are available in the service. Summary: These Black Marble Day-Night Band (BRDF-Corrected) images were created by the NASA Black Marble Science team. The images are corrected for atmospheric, terrain, lunar BRDF, and straylight effects, and directly measures light intensity on the ground in units of nanowatts/(steradian centimeter squared). The images are scaled from 0 - 30. Additional cloud cover layers are included to indicate where clouds are present. The baseline image is from September 2025, generated from all daily atmospheric and lunar-corrected data from that month. There is a layer to display where clouds are present. This comparison between the images is meant as a visual assessment of outage impacts to aid various partners who are working to deliver emergency aids to local communities. Power outage maps like these help disaster response efforts in the short-term as well as long-term monitoring during the crucial stages of disaster recovery. Suggested Use: NASA's Black Marble Nighttime Light product suite is a state-of-the-art daily global collection of standard products for monitoring nighttime lights (NTL). Utilizing the Visible Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Day/Night Band (DNB) aboard the Suomi-NPP, NOAA-20, and NOAA-21 satellites. The image is in inferno color scale. Yellow represents presence of more light; dark blue less lights. Observations may be obscured by total or partial cloud cover. Other factors such as snow reflectance, moon phase, wildfires, and wildfire smoke may distort light radiance and require further analysis when assessing power outages. Grey represents cloud cover. Satellite/Sensor: Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Day/Night Band (DNB) onboard the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Platform (SNPP), NOAA-20, and NOAA-21 Resolution: 500 meters Credits: NASA Black Marble Science team Please cite the following two references when using this data: Román MO, Stokes EC, Shrestha R, Wang Z, Schultz L, Carlo EA, Sun Q, Bell J, Molthan A, Kalb V, Ji C. Satellite-based assessment of electricity restoration efforts in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. PloS one. 2019 Jun 28;14(6):e0218883. Román MO, Wang Z, Sun Q, Kalb V, Miller SD, Molthan A, Schultz L, Bell J, Stokes EC, Pandey B, Seto KC. NASA's Black Marble nighttime lights product suite. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2018 Jun 1;210:113-43. Point of Contact: Ranjay Shrestha NASA Goddard Space Flight Center E-mail: ranjay.m.shrestha@nasa.gov Additional Links: NASA’s Black Marble Product Suite Román, M.O. et al. (2019) Satellite-based assessment of electricity restoration efforts in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. PLoS One, 14 (6). Román, M.O. et al. (2018) NASA’s Black Marble nighttime lights product suite. Remote Sensing of Environment. 210, 113–143. WMS Endpoint: https://gis.earthdata.nasa.gov/portal/services/202601_BlackMarble_BRDF_CloudMask/ImageServer/WMSServer

States and Counties (or statistically equivalent entities); January 1, 2015 vintage; Generalized

ACS 2024 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2024 vintage

Census Current (2020) Physical Features Web Map Service; January 1, 2020 vintage

Census Current (2026) WMS Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2026 vintage

Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2010 vintage

Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas and Related Statistical Areas: Metropolitan NECTAs, Micropolitan NECTAs, Combined Statistical Areas, Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Micropolitan Statistical Areas; January 1, 2015 vintage; Generalized

Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2010 vintage

Census Current (2020) Physical Features Web Map Service; January 1, 2020 vintage

Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2020 vintage

Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2020 vintage

ACS 2015 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2015 vintage

Congressional Districts, Voting Districts, State Legislative Districts - Upper, State Legislative Districts - Lower; January 1, 2022 vintage; Generalized

Congressional Districts, Voting Districts, State Legislative Districts - Upper, State Legislative Districts - Lower; January 1, 2015 vintage; Generalized

Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2020 vintage

Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2000 vintage

Retirement Notice: This item is in mature support as of February 2026 and will retire in December 2027. A new version of this item is available for your use. Esri recommends updating your maps and apps to use the new version. This layer shows children by age group by parents' labor force participation. This is shown by tract, county, and state centroids. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis.   This layer is symbolized to show the count and percent of children with no available (residential) parent in the labor force.  To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top left.  Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B23008Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.gov  The United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the Survey   Geography & ACS   Technical Documentation   News & Updates   This ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data. Data Note from the Census:  Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data).  The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables. Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.   Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2023 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters). The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico Census tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99). Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey. Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page. Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate. Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.   The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate. The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.   The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Dates of Images: Post-Event: July 4, 2026 Pre-Event: June 19, 2026 Date of Next Image: Unknown Summary: Normalized Differential Vegetation Index (NDVI) maps are produced by converting pixel values to NDVI = (Red – NIR)/(Red + NIR), NIR indicates the near infrared band. The dynamically generated Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) layer is an index for quantifying green vegetation. It reflects the state of vegetation health based on how vegetation reflects light at certain wavelengths. NDVI change was created by subtracting the cloud-masked post-event NDVI from the cloud-masked pre-event NDVI to show areas of potentially impacted vegetation as negative values (darker shades) and healthy/unimpacted vegetation in positive values (lighter shades). NDVI change can give insights to impacts from an event (like the scouring of vegetation from the riverbeds) but can also show changes in unrelated areas like the clearing of agriculture fields. This layer is a binary NDVI change polygon (threshold of areas where NDVI decreased by -0.25 or more) for June 19, 2026 as compared to July 4, 2026. Suggested Use: NDVI change: Commonly used to distinguish healthy/active vegetation (positive values) from potentially unhealthy/impacted vegetation (negative values). This map shows a binary flag where NDVI decreased. Satellite/Sensor: MultiSpectral Instrument (MSI) on European Space Agency's (ESA) Copernicus Sentinel-2A/2B satellites Resolution: 10 meters Credits: NASA/MSFC, USGS, ESA Copernicus Esri REST Endpoint: See URL section on right side of page

This digital geographic dataset contains point features that represent the Building Permits issued by the City of Miami Building Department since the year 2014. The attribute table contains extensive information regarding the building permit itself, including the applications, status, cost, days, review status and many other items of interest.

Congressional Districts, Voting Districts, State Legislative Districts - Upper, State Legislative Districts - Lower; January 1, 2021 vintage; Generalized