United States of America GIS data
＋ Follow new data2,414 datasets.
Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) Fire Hazard Severity Zone classes from the map dated September 29, 2023, as adopted on January 31, 2024 and implemented on April 1, 2024 This layer was acquired/downloaded from the CalFire OSFM. Below is the original metadata that came with the layer: The State Fire Marshal shall classify lands within state responsibility areas into fire hazard severity zones. Each zone shall embrace relatively homogeneous lands and shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors present, including areas where winds have been identified by the department as a major cause of wildfire spread. The California laws and regulations that require Fire Hazard Severity Zones include California Public Resource code 4201-4204 and California Code of Regulations Title 19, Section 2201. Effective April 1, 2024 this regulatory adoption repeals Section 1280.1 of Title 14 California Code of Regulations and adopts similar regulatory provisions in Section 2201 of Title 19 California Code of Regulations. A prior version of this file and data was released as part of the data package accompanying the final Public Comment period for Fire Hazard Severity Zones (September 29, 2023). This previous version and this version are the same geographic representation of Fire Hazard Severity Zones and are now part of the formal regulation as adopted. While under normal workflow any revision to a public data file would get reflected in the filename, in this case the file name remains identical as it is part of the adopted regulation. The only changes reflect edits to the metadata describing timing of adoption and effective date for the regulation. Calistoga Revisions (2025) Revisions were made within Calistoga city limits by request of Calistoga City Fire (Jed Matcham). Fire Hazard Severity Zones were expanded to cover all parcels they intersect. Each parcel was assigned the highest severity zone it overlapped with. Steps taken to update Fire Hazard Severity Zones within Calistoga Fire Hazard Severity Zones within Calistoga City Limits were erased from the original layer downloaded from Calfire. Join Calistoga Parcels with original FHSZ layer by spatial intersect. If parcel intersects with multiple FHSZs, duplicate parcels with different FHSZ zones exist. Per parcel, only keep parcel with highest severity Dissolve parcel polygons from Calistoga_FHSZ by severity zone. This will combine features that have the same severity zone. Clip ROW FHSZ Zones within Calistoga (They will be appended back in later). This is done so when I append them to the FHSZ_Erase layer, all polygons within Calistoga end at the city boundaries. Append Calistoga_FHSZ_Dissolve polygon layer and Calistoga_ROW_Clipped to FHSZ_Erased layer. Merge ROW polygons of the same Fire Hazard Severity Class with Parcel Polygons of the same Fire Hazard Severity Class where they are adjacent. Cleaned up the SRA / LRA divide to follow the Calistoga City Limits in North central Part of town
CWHR Predicted Habitat Models represent areas of predicted suitable habitat for each species within its range. These models are built from the following principal inputs: 1) a statewide, best-available vegetation map (FVEG); 2) GIS data representing a species’ range; 3) the CWHR database of habitat suitability values for over 700 terrestrial vertebrate species. Habitat suitability ranks of Low (non-zero values less than 0.34), Medium (0.34-0.66), and High (greater than 0.66) are based on the maximum suitability value across the 3 species life requisites: reproduction, feeding, and cover. Note that previous versions of these Predicted Habitat Models used an average across the 3 life requisites in order to obtain an overall suitability score for each habitat type and stage class. Habitat suitability scores were developed based on habitat patch sizes greater than 40 acres in size and are best interpreted for habitat patches greater than 200 acres in size. The FVEG landcover dataset is an aggregation of multiple statewide landcover and regional vegetation mapping efforts, conducted at different points in time (approximately 1990 up to time of publishing) and at various resolutions, compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE). FVEG uses the most current and consistent data available for each region of the state. Decision rules were developed that controlled which layers were given priority in areas of overlap. Crosswalks were used to attribute the various data sources according to the CWHR habitat-type classification system. Attributing FVEG with CWHR habitat types allows for the extraction of areas with non-zero suitability values for each species within the bounds of its range, creating a series of maps of predicted suitable habitat which are species-specific. Because FVEG is an amalgam of disparate landcover assessment efforts across the state, the predictive power for determining suitable habitat will vary between species, and possibly even regionally for species which are widely distributed. While these maps represent CDFW’s best estimate of the presence of suitable habitat for any given species in the CWHR system, these maps are also limited by several factors: 1) the accuracy and resolution of vegetation maps in a given region; 2) the dynamic nature of the landscape in which fire and other disturbance events alter conditions at a greater frequency than mapping efforts can track; 3) the currency of expert knowledge, particularly as species adapt to changing land and climate conditions and the shifting of other species’ ranges; 4) the frequency of species-specific surveys across a representative sample of a species’ entire range; 5) metapopulation dynamics, which describes the shifting of populations within their environment as result of numerous types of interactions and responses. CWHR GIS data representing predicted suitable habitat should not be used to indicate the presence or absence of a particular species at any specific site. CWHR predicted habitat models are named according to the 4-character alpha-numeric CWHR ID assigned to each species (5 characters in the case of subspecies or other sub-taxa). There is also a “CWHR Revision Tracking Table” containing a record for each species, its CWHR ID, scientific name, common name, and range and habitat model data revision history. CWHR species range models, predicted habitat models, and GIS data of the statewide distribution of all CWHR habitat types, along with the CWHR revision tracking table, are available for download at https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CWHR.
Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2010 vintage
Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2010 vintage
ACS 2018 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2018 vintage
Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2000 vintage
Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2010 vintage
A list of the violations recorded against permitted restaurants that failed inspection. Data Dictionary: EstablishmentID - Permit Number InspectionDate - date of inspection InspectionID - system inspection id EstTypeDesc - desciption of facility type premise_name - facility name premise_adr1_num - facility street number premise_adr1_street - facility street premise_city - facility city premise_state - facility state premise_zip - facility zip code InspectionType - description of inspection type score - inspection score InspTypeSpecificViolID - Violation ID for specific type of facility ViolationDesc - text description of violation critical_yn - Is the violation critical? Insp_Viol_Comments - violation comments rpt_area_id - Establishment Type Code Health and Wellness Protects and promotes the health, environment and well being of the people of Louisville, providing health-related programs and health office locations community wide. Contact: Gerald Kaforski gerald.kaforski@louisvilleky.gov
Routine reinspection of over 537 public pools and treated water aquatic facilities in the US State of Kentucky, totalling over 2,000 inspections per year. Inspections include spas (hot tubs), pools, wave pools, splash pads, theme park pools, and special purpose pools (such as dive pools) etc. Purpose of inspections is included in this data set. For more information on Louisville Metro’s aquatic inspection program and policies, see: https://louisvilleky.gov/government/health-wellness/swimming-pools Data will be updated weekly. Each week the data will be posted as a rolling five year table. That is the new data will be a set that includes inspections from the day of posting minus five years. Data Dictionary:Field Name-Definition InspectionID-Unique Identifier for the inspection Facility ID-Unique Identifier for the Facility Facility Name-Name of the Facility Facility Address-Location of the Facility Facility Address 2-Location of the Facility Facility City-Location of the Facility Facility State-Location of the Facility Facility Postal Code-Location of the Facility Facility County-Location of the Facility Venue Type- * POOL-Any natural or artificial body or basin of water which is modified, improved, constructed or installed for the purpose of public swimming or bathing under the control or any person and includes but is not limited to the following: beaches, swimming pools, wave pools, competition swimming pools, diving pools, water slides and spray pools. * HOT TUB/SPA-A special facility designed for recreational and therapeutic use, and which is not drained, cleaned, or refilled after each individual use. It may include, but not limited to, units designed for hydrojet circulation, hot water, cold water, mineral bath, air induction bubbles, or any combination thereof. Common terminology for a spa includes but not limited to, therapeutic pool, hydrotherapy pool, whirlpool, hot spa * WADING POOL-A pool intended only for small children. The maximum depth is less than twenty-four (24) inches. * OTHER-Any other swimming facility not specifically defined Inspection Date-Date the inspection was performed Inspection Score-"value between 0-100%, 86% without critical issue is a passing facility. A facility facility may have a score of 0 if the purpose of the inspection was ""Other""" Inspection Purpose- * ROUTINE: Used to record routine inspection on an establishment and other facilities. * FOLLOW-UP: Used to record all follow-up inspections as a result of a previous inspection. * COMPLAINT: Used to record the investigation of a complaint received by the agency for regulated establishments, nuisances and the initial investigation for an animal bite. * OTHER: The inspections are not given a numerical score. This inspection type used to record monitoring inspections for swimming pools. " Inspection Passed-TRUE: Inspection Score >= 86% without any critical violations. No Imminent Health Hazards-TRUE: no conditions are present that required of immediate closure of facility. Disinfectant-Type of disinfectant used at the facility, either BROMINE or CHLORINE Free Chlorine-measured in parts per million (PPM), the amount of free Chlorine in the body of water. Free Bromine-measured in parts per million (PPM), the amount of free Bromine in the body of water. pH-The amount of acidity measured in the body of water. Enclosure-TRUE: Facility Enclosure: adequate, self closing gate, good repair or locked if no lifeguard on duty. Main Drain Visible-TRUE: Turbidity: the water is clear enough to see the main drain at the bottom of the body of water. Safety Equipment"-TRUE: First Aid, Safety Equipment, Spa Timer Switch, Telephone: readily accessible, adequate, maintained, good repair POOLS and/or SPAS could include elevated lifeguard chair, ring buoy, life pole/shepherds crook, backboard with straps, first aid kit. " Disinfectant Level-TRUE: CHLORINE disinfectant levels maintained between 1.0 and 2.5ppm for pools or slides, 2.0 and 3.0ppm for spas. BROMINE disinfectant levels maintained between 1.0 and 2.5ppm for pools or slides, 3.0ppm for spas. Anything outside this range is considered a violation. When only a shallow end reading is taken or shallow and deep end reading the shallow end value is used. If only a deep end reading is taken that value is used. pH Balance-TRUE: pH value tested between 7.2 and 7.8, anything outside this range is considered a violation. Inspection Notes-Description of violations noted at the facility. Health and Wellness Protects and promotes the health, environment and well being of the people of Louisville, providing health-related programs and health office locations community wide. Contact: Gerald Kaforski LMPHWDataTeam@Louisvilleky.gov
ACS 2012 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2012 vintage
Line features representing transmission lines in Utah, published by the Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center. Each feature includes a voltage attribute (KV) and a length measurement.
Subdivision polygons in Dakota County for the purpose of labeling. CIC's will not be labeled as they are part of their original underlying subdivision plat. Esri File Geodatabase DownloadEsri Shapefile DownloadOGC GeoPackage Download
ACS 2015 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2015 vintage
Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2010 vintage
Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2020 vintage
uav imagery by WebODM, acquired 2026-01-24 to 2026-01-24, 1.0 cm per pixel, published on OpenAerialMap.
satellite imagery by North Metro Fire, acquired 2026-06-30 to 2026-07-01, 0.8 cm per pixel, published on OpenAerialMap.
EnviroAtlas image service of HistAnnualPrecip for time slider
Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2020 vintage
ACS 2022 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2022 vintage
ACS 2018 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2018 vintage
Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2000 vintage
ACS 2026 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2026 vintage
ACS 2018 Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2018 vintage
uav imagery by WebODM, acquired 2025-08-07 to 2025-08-07, 5.0 cm per pixel, published on OpenAerialMap.
https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/CaliforniaARB::california-air-district-boundaries/about The air quality control board dataset represents the Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District (a.k.a. NSCAPCD) and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (a.k.a. BAAQMD). The Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District set forth Rule 110 which states: rules and regulations are set forth to achieve and maintain such levels of air quality as will protect human health and safety; prevent injury to plant and animal life; avoid damage to property; and preserve the comfort, convenience and enjoyment of the natural attractions of the California North Coast Air Basin. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District is committed to achieving clean air to protect the public's health and the environment in the San Francisco Bay region. The Air District aims to: 1) attain and maintain air quality standards, 2) increase public awareness of positive air quality choices, and 3) develop and implement protocol and policies for environmental justice. It is the intent of all air pollution control districts and air quality management districts in the California North Coast Air Basin to adopt and enforce rules and regulations which assure that reasonable provision is made to achieve and maintain state and federal ambient air quality standards for the area under their jurisdiction and to enforce all applicable provisions of State law.
Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2020 vintage
Estates, County Subdivisions, Subbarrios, Consolidated Cities, Incorporated Places, Census Designated Places; January 1, 2020 vintage
uav imagery by WebODM, acquired 2025-09-11 to 2025-09-11, 2.0 cm per pixel, published on OpenAerialMap.
Provides data for code cases that were opened in the past 90 days based on district, address, and type of code case.
Places in the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) This feature layer, utilizing National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA) data from the U.S. Geological Survey, displays populated places from the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS). Per USGS, “the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) is the federal standard for geographic nomenclature. The U.S. Geological Survey developed the GNIS for the U.S. Board on Geographic Names, a Federal inter-agency body chartered by public law to maintain uniform feature name usage throughout the Government and to promulgate standard names to the public. The GNIS is the official repository of domestic geographic names data; the official vehicle for geographic names use by all departments of the Federal Government; and the source for applying geographic names to Federal electronic and printed products of all types.”
uav imagery by Branding Skys, acquired 2026-04-09 to 2026-04-09, 5.6 cm per pixel, published on OpenAerialMap.
Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2020 vintage
Legal and Statistical Entities Web Map Service; January 1, 2020 vintage
Boundaries and dates of the imagery blocks in the Google imagery service
The data provided in this dataset is preliminary in nature and may have not been investigated by a detective at the time of download. The data is therefore subject to change after a complete investigation. This data represents only calls for police service where a police incident report was taken. Due to the variations in local laws and ordinances involving crimes across the nation, whether another agency utilizes Uniform Crime Report (UCR) or National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) guidelines, and the results learned after an official investigation, comparisons should not be made between the statistics generated with this dataset to any other official police reports. Totals in the database may vary considerably from official totals following the investigation and final categorization of a crime. Therefore, the data should not be used for comparisons with Uniform Crime Report or other summary statistics. Data is broken out by year into separate CSV files. Note the file grouping by year is based on the crime's Date Reported (not the Date Occurred). Older cases found in the 2003 data are indicative of cold case research. Older cases are entered into the Police database system and tracked but dates and times of the original case are maintained. Data may also be viewed off-site in map form for just the last 6 months on communitycrimemap.com Data Dictionary: Field Name Field Description Incident Number the number associated with either the incident or used as reference to store the items in our evidence rooms Date Reported the date the incident was reported to LMPD Date Occurred the date the incident actually occurred Badge ID Badge ID of responding Officer Offense Classification NIBRS Reporting category for the criminal act committed Offense Code Name NIBRS Reporting code for the criminal act committed NIBRS_CODE the code that follows the guidelines of the National Incident Based Reporting System. For more details visit https://ucr.fbi.gov/nibrs/2011/resources/nibrs-offense-codes/view NIBRS Group hierarchy that follows the guidelines of the FBI National Incident Based Reporting System Was Offense Completed Status indicating whether the incident was an attempted crime or a completed crime. LMPD Division the LMPD division in which the incident actually occurred LMPD Beat the LMPD beat in which the incident actually occurred Location Category the type of location in which the incident occurred (e.g. Restaurant) Block Address the location the incident occurred City the city associated to the incident block location Zip Code the zip code associated to the incident block location Contact: LMPD Open Records lmpdopenrecords@louisvilleky.gov