Montenegro - Wildfire (EMSR922)
About this dataset
Documentation
Related datasets
GLIDEnumbers are GLobal unique IDEntifiers for Disasters. Each disaster is registered in a record that contains a GLIDEnumber that uniquely identifies it and allows information to be interoperable across multiple disaster information sources, both structured and textual. Accessing disaster information can be a time consuming and laborious task. Not only is data scattered but frequently identification of the disaster can be confusing in countries with many disaster events and across borders. To address both of these issues, Asian Disaster Reduction Center (ADRC) proposed a globally common Unique ID code for disasters. Among the institutions using actively GLIDEnumbers are UN-OCHA (ReliefWeb, FSCC, HDX), UNDRR, UNDP, WMO, IFRC, FAO, the European Commission and the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), among many others. Country datasets are only produced for countries with at least one GLIDE event since 1 January 2022. The global dataset contains all events available from the GLIDE API, including those not assigned to a country.
Temporal coverage: Current calendar year - Today Data Sources: VIIRS Sensor on NOAA-20 Time Interval: Every 12 Hours Data Latency: ~ 9 - 12 hours from satellite overpass Projection: EPSG:4326 Spatial Extent: Contiguous United States, Alaska, and Canada. Portions of Alaska west of 169 Degrees west and portions of Canada north of 75 degrees north are excluded. Resolution: Vector data derived from the 375 m nadir resolution of the VIIRS sensors Purpose / use case: The FEDS algorithm is an “event-based” approach that tracks the growth and intensity of individual fires every 12 hours and treats them as discrete objects that persist, expand, and evolve together. This tracking strategy allows for detailed monitoring of large fires in space and time as they spread across a landscape. The algorithm clusters VIIRS active fire observations into specific fire events, and then estimates a fire perimeter polygon, the active segment of the perimeter, and metrics for each fire, such as the total estimated area (km^2) and length of the active fire front (km). Each 12-hour increment also includes information on a fire’s mean Fire Radiative Power (FRP), which is a metric that describes fire intensity as estimated by the satellite sensor. This dataset is best used for near real-time situational awareness and retrospective scientific analysis of fire behavior. Notes on Interpretation of the Data: As a satellite-based data product, FEDS has lower spatial resolution and accuracy than fire perimeters derived in operational contexts, such as those from airborne imagers. However, FEDS can provide information when other sources are unavailable, and the algorithm runs automatically in fixed 12-hr intervals for all clusters of fire activity greater than 4 km^2. The FEDS algorithm inherits the same uncertainties associated with the VIIRS active fire product. These include potential geolocation errors that can be relevant for interpreting fire locations and fire spread. For example, hot plumes of smoke can generate false positive detections that overestimate the size of the fire at that time step. In addition, active fire detections may be clustered into events that do not align directly with operational definitions of fire events (i.e., FEDS may group multiple agency-designated fires into a single fire event, or consider a single agency-designated fire to be multiple fire events). Finally, clouds or thick smoke may lead to the omission of VIIRS active fire detections, leading to an underestimate of fire activity and fire spread. More information on the interpretation of the VIIRS Active Fire Dataset for fires can be found in the NASA Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) FAQ. Source information/ Program Information: This dataset was developed as part of the NASA Earth Information Systems (EIS) project. This dataset was generated through the Wildfire Tracking Lab –a collaboration between scientists at NASA Goddard, NASA Langley, NASA Marshall, University of California Irvine, and University of Maryland. Citation: Chen et al. “California wildfire spread derived using VIIRS satellite observations and an object-based tracking system.” Scientific data 9.1 (2022): 249 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01343-0. Repository: The underlying algorithm that generates these data layers is hosted and developed at the Fire Events Data Suite repository. Parameters: Column Name: t Description: Time of VIIRS detection. Data collected during approximately 1:30 AM and 1:30 PM local solar time overpasses. The time component of the datetime is assigned a local time of 00:00:00 for 1:30 AM overpasses, and 12:00:00 for 1:30 PM overpasses. Unit is Datetime. yyyy-mm-ddThh:mm:ss. Time component is in local solar time. Date component is the UTC date. UTC date will match local date for all of CONUS and Canada, but will not match for Alaska. Column Name: region Description: Descriptive name of larger region where tracking is occurring. Column Name: fireid Description: Fire ID. Unique for each fire within a given region. Unit is Numeric ID Column: geometry Description: The location of the pixels. Unit is Geometry. CRS is EPSG:4326. Column: Primary Key Description: Globally unique identifier for a given layer entry. This key is formatted by [region]|[fireid]|[timestamp]. Unitless. Alternate Forms Of Data Access: This data can also be accessed through an API. Documentation for the API can be found here. The API distributes data in open source data formats. Contact: For inquiries about service performance please contact support@earthdata.nasa.gov or post/view questions on the Earthdata Forum. For questions about the data, please contact the science team with this form.
Dates of Images: July 9, 2025 Date of Next Image: None Expected Summary: These maps show the results of a machine learning classification applied to UAVSAR data to identify open water flooding and inundation under tree canopy. Colored areas in the image show detected flooding, where the color shows the type of landcover which was flooded (see legend below). Non-flooded areas are transparent. The classification uses a U-Net machine learning algorithm which was trained using UAVSAR data from previous flood events. UAVSAR provides polarimetric synthetic aperture radar data from which different types of scattering mechanisms can be observed, which provides information on the type of flooding. For example, flooding underneath vegetation produces strong double-bounce scattering from the water surface and tree trunks. However, strong double-bounce scattering from urban areas aligned with the radar viewing direction, such as in Austin, TX, can produce erroneous classifications. Non-flooded vegetation is generally dominated by volume scattering from the forest canopy. In comparison, open water flooding exhibits weak radar returns in all polarizations. Suggested Use: Classified Images: Blue = Open Water Yellow = Flooded Developed Green = Flooded Vegetation Orange = Flooded Crop Satellite/Sensor: UAVSAR airborne L-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) aboard a NASA Gulfstream C-20A jet. Resolution: 10 meters Credits: UAVSAR data courtesy of NASA/JPL-Caltech Esri REST Endpoint: See URL section on right side of the page WMS Endpoint: https://gis.earthdata.nasa.gov/portal/services/DISASTERS_202507_FLOOD_TX/202507_UAVSAR/MapServer/WMSServer Data Download: https://uavsar.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/download-files.pl
NOTE: Due to the higher resolution of this data, it may be slow to load or require the user to zoom to a smaller area of interest. Date of Images: Post-Event: 10/24/2025, 10/23/2025, 10/21/2025, 10/20/2025, 10/18,2025 Pre-Event: 9/10/2025, 9/13/2025, 9/14/2025, 9/15/2025, 9/20/2025 Date of Next Image: Unknown Summary: The True Color RGB composite provides a product of how the surface would look to the naked eye from space. The RGB is created using the red, green, and blue channels of the respective instrument. Suggested Use: The True Color RGB provides a product of how the surface would look to the naked eye from space and may show damage caused by severe weather. The True Color RGB is produced using the 3 visible wavelength bands (red, green, and blue) from the respective sensor. Some minor atmospheric corrections have occurred. Satellite/Sensor: PlanetScope Resolution: 3 Meters Esri REST Endpoint: See URL section on right side of page
Date of Image(s): 1/10/25; UTC: 223109 1/10/25; UTC: 222449 Summary: The images are false-color “quick looks” generated from the NASA AVIRIS-3 (Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer -3). They are generated from un-atmospherically-corrected, at-sensor radiance data. Specifically: AVIRIS 3 L1B calibrated spectral radiance (units: uW nm-1 cm-2 sr-1). The images have been orthorectified. Given that these images were derived from solely calibrated, at-sensor radiance data, they have not undergone atmospheric correction and do not quantitatively represent surface reflectance. Suggested Usage: Despite the rawer form of this quick-look product, it is still useful for burned area mapping. Sensor: Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer 3rd-Generation (AVIRIS-3) AV320250110t223109 Resolution: 3.70 x 3.70 m pixels Dimensions for AV320250110t223109: X: 6210 Y: 3068 Bands: 3 AV320250110t222449 Resolution: 3.40 x 3.40 m pixels Dimensions for AV320250110t222449: X: 6593 Y: 3465 Bands: 3 The AVIRIS-3 False color RGB wavelengths are 1660nm, 850nm, and 560nm for (R, G, B) respectively. Credits: Rob Green (JPL), Phil Brodrick (JPL), David Thompson (JPL), John Chapman (JPL), Michael Eastwood (JPL), and Adam Chlus (JPL). Service URL: https://gis.earthdata.nasa.gov/portal/home/item.html?id=843bb9103d94417bac6724a8d90a27ce WMS Endpoint: https://gis.earthdata.nasa.gov/portal/services/DISASTERS_202501_FIRE_CA/2501_aviris_QuickLook/ImageServer/WMSServer
Date of Images: Post-Event: June 26, 2025 at 00:59 UTC (about 6:59PM MT) Pre-Event: June 20, 2025 Summary: We developed a rapid-response workflow to map flooded areas during this emergency event using multi-temporal Sentinel-1 SAR data. Sentinel-1’s SAR backscatter characteristics are particularly effective for detecting surface water: water surfaces typically exhibit low backscatter, whereas non-water areas show higher backscatter. Leveraging this physical property, we distinguished between water and non-water surfaces from both pre- and post-flood observations. To highlight flood-induced surface changes, we computed the differenced co-polarized VV backscatter (dVV = VV_post – VV_pre). This change detection technique enhances the visibility of newly inundated areas. We then applied a simple threshold to the dVV image to separate flooded from non-flooded areas. Suggested Use: The final output is a binary raster product, where pixels with a value of 1 represent flooded areas (dark blue color). Satellite/Sensor: Sentinel-1 /Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Resolution: 10 meters Credits: Dr. Khuong H. Tran (Khuong.tran@nasa.gov) Service URL: https://gis.earthdata.nasa.gov/portal/home/item.html?id=87d3edc8e19d437da1336481506ff377 WMS Endpoint: https://gis.earthdata.nasa.gov/portal/services/DISASTERS_202506_FIRE_NM/2506_sentinel1_flood/ImageServer/WMSServer
Indexed by OrionGIS from Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX). Data is loaded from the publisher's own server when you use it. Permanent link